Sunday, April 3, 2011

The pleasure of visual processing

Modern cognitive (and brain) research offers some interesting views on how our visual system works, for example how horizontal and vertical lines are recognized, how contrast plays a role, how movement (real or implied) is recognized, and so on. (Edit: Or symmetry.)

You could say that we are on the verge of understanding how we see the world, and it is a fascinating machinery indeed what we have in our head.

Today I thought whether some of the pleasure we get from looking at photographs stems from the way they engage our visual system - perhaps there is a similar kind of effect as when you get physical exercise, but in this case from exercising the brain.

Another thing is that perhaps some day we know in detail how a specific photograph works, and this leads to opporturnities for the computer-generation of photographs with impact. Like a super-photoshop...

Another view on this provided by the French sociologist Roland Barthes in the book Camera Lucida (originally La Chambre Claire, also translated into Finnish as Valoisa huone).

I haven't yet read the book, but I made a reservation at the local library when I saw Markus Spring writing about it: "Also his emphasis on things not plainly visible in an image, yet connected through the knowledge of the observer, is an interesting aspect – and hard to take into consideration when creating an image."

This seems to be an interesting approach to think about, but I have to see whether I can understand what the book is about. Some socioligists are just too obscure for me to bother reading.

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Buying cameras, reading about photography

I went for a long walk today, 1 1/2 hours in a forest, and although it was wet and slushy, I felt good. The new Sievi hiking shoes are proving themselves - they are sturdy, waterproof, and have a good grip. One should never underestimate shoes, where would we be without them?

It seems that photographers are getting new cameras. First Andreas Manessinger bought the Panasonic LX5, and has written interesting postings about it. And now Paul Lester bought the Leica M9, and seems to appreciate it.

And I'm still using the LX3. Not that I haven't been thinking about other cameras. On the other hand, there is still so much to learn about photography, and getting a new camera might be a distraction.

I'm currently reading The Complete Guide to Black & White Digital Photography by Michael Freeman. This is an excellent book - not only about black and white photography, but about photography in general.

Freeman gives an excellent overview of the history of photography, and the reasons for the complicated relation between b&w and color photography. And not only that, Freeman discusses photography as art, without being arrogant about it.

And best of all, Freeman gives plenty of examples where a b&w version of a photograph works better than in color - and also comparisons where b&w and color version are both good, only different. Highly recommended book!

However, I didn't take any b&w photographs today. It was clouded and wet, and so there was plenty of colors to look at.

Friday, April 1, 2011

Vehicle of vision

Today was a wet day, but such a day is a good day, as wetness deepens the colors and thus provides opporturnities for a photographer.

Continuing the beauty vs. art vs. everyday theme, The Guardian had a nice article about "the holiday photo", saying: "My father is today nearly five years dead. But, thanks to this holiday snap, he is brought back to life for one last game, a game that never ends.[...] Those days are gone for ever and eternally present. The colours are faded, but not enough to stop the photograph breaking my heart."

Photographs do have power, every day.

But moving from the personal to the universal, what is the thing which makes a photograph into a vehicle of vision?