TOP had recently an interesting (alhtough rambling) posting about photography:
I presented a diagram that looked something like this: [...] Where green was professional or commercial photography, orange was editorial photography or photojournalism, and blue was art photography and academic photography. A hand immediately shot up from the back of the room: "And what kind of photographer are you?" Without thinking, I replied, "I'm a writer."
I'm not a photographer in this sense either, just a person with a hobby, doing other things to earn a living. And I don't want to spoil my relation to photography with too much seriousness.
Speaking of seriousness, recently I read "The Prophet Muhammad: A Biography" by Barnaby Rogerson. It was a revealing book about the effect of visions. Compared to this, we all are amateurs. You don't need to own a camera (or even to be able to read and write) to make changes in the world.
Speaking of visions, Mark Hobson
apparently doesn't like TOP much, "since it went to really focusing on gear." There is something here, but true to his style Hobson really underlines his point.
On the other hand, I can't help liking his photographs, although sometimes I have a nagging feeling of them being produced in an "industrial" process. Is there really something under the surface?