We went outside today with the children, to enjoy the sunshine at noon. It was cold, but not too cold, and the children enjoyed playing in the snow.
I took quite a few photographs, but didn't really concentrate on photography, but no matter, this was a fine day anyway.
Since finishing the book "Within the Frame" by David duChemin, of which I wrote a somewhat caustic review, I have returned to re-reading other books about photography.
Freeman Patterson's "Photographing the World Around You" was even better than I remembered, providing a feast of discussion about developing photography skills. Now I'm re-reading "Photography for the Joy of It" (by Freeman Patterson and André Gallant), another great book which I have read two or three times previously, but always find new insights there.
Update: I have been thinking about micro 4/3 cameras every once in a while, especially Olympus E-PL1 (which is not yet available). TOP had some time ago an excellent posting about "small format", here is a quote: "The vast majority of consumers has no need for anything above micro 4/3. Proof? They have survived just fine until now with p&s microscopic sensors! [...] That takes care of 80% of the market. End of story. [...] Like it or not, the current vast majority of "photographers" who claim to need more are of the pixel-peping variety. Or in other words: the furthest removed from photography one can get!"
Why I haven't yet invested in micro 4/3 is down to two things: lens selection and the excellence of the Panasonic LX3. If there were two lenses (in addition to the existing and excellent Panasonic 20 mm f/1.7), I would take the leap: a 12 mm (24 mm equiv.) f/2.8 pancake and a 40 mm (or 50 mm) f/2.8 macro. These three lenses would be all that is needed, at least for the moment. Going back to primes, that would be an interesting thing indeed.
Men's room
6 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment