I have been thinking, once again, whether I'm taking too many photos. Should I be more careful, do more "pre-editing" instead of shooting hundreds of photos daily?
When I used a film camera, the price of film and development kept the number of photos small, and I did a lot of "simulated" photos, deciding not to take a photo after all. With digital, I can afford to compose a photo, shoot, and move the position or framing slightly, and shoot again.
By this iterative process I not only can move towards an acceptable photo, and also keep a record of my progress. In fact, often in post-processing I'm planning to crop a picture in a certain way, and then I found that the next image in the series was framed exactly that way.
But should I nevertheless change my shooting habits? Do more visual exporing and less shooting? I don't know. The current approach feels right, and although there is a price to be paid later - the LX3 will break down due to having a lot of use - I'm planning to continue like this.
I was reading - once again - a photography book by Freeman Patterson. I like his attitude towards subjects - he can spend days, weeks, months and even years exporing a single subject. I feel there is a similar kind of adventure available in the places here nearby. No need to go visiting fancy resorts somewhere far away.
She tries to focus on what she knows.
14 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment