The advantage of using a point-and-shoot is that you can combine walking (or any similar not-too-strenuous exercise) and photography, at least if your photography ambition is a bit more modest, as mine is.
The Panasonic LX3 seems to be quite a nice compromise between pocketability (jacket pocket) and features plus image quality. I have used it now for just three days, so can't say whether it can really do more that any typical point-and-shoot camera, but it definetely has some promise.
I have thought a bit about the latest (and very negative) review of LX3 at DCI (Digital Camera Info), and I must say that their findings about low resolution and poor low-light performance seem to be suspect. Somehow they managed to rate elsewhere quite poorly regarded compacts (for example Panasonic TZ3) as better that LX3 or Canon G9.
I suspect that the methodology used at DCI doesn't work, and the reviewers don't have the skills to really analyze the results. This also shows that a review based on direct interpretation of image data (especially in jpeg format) is fraught with peril.
Update: It is interesting to compare the DCI review with a reasonably detailed review at PhotoReview Australia: "Low light performance was excellent with little noise visible up to ISO 800 and only a slight progressive increase thereafter." Both reviews are using a similar kind of testing setup, and although there are some similarities in the findings, the test results and conclusions are very different.
It was lovely to be tired.
17 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment